Inelastic Deformation and Local Slenderness Requirements for Rectangular HSS Braces

Abstract

Rectangular hollow structural sections (HSS) are commonly used as bracing in concentrically braced frames (CBFs) designed and detailed for seismic design requirements. As the primary yielding component in CBFs, braces are expected to sustain large inelastic axial deformation during earthquake loading. It is well known that their deformation capacity depends on the width-to-thickness ratio (local slenderness). Until 2013, HSS sections were produced to meet ASTM standard A500/A500M; after 2013, the ASTM 1085 specification was implemented, and since that time, HSS sections have also been produced to meet ASTM A1085/A1085M standards. Where the ASTM A500/A500M specification requires minimum yield and tensile stress values as well as a minimum elongation and tolerances on the wall thickness, the ASTM A1085/A1085M specification also requires a minimum Charpy V-notch (CVN) toughness, a maximum yield stress of the steel, and tighter tolerances on the wall thickness and radius of curvature of the corner. These requirements offer a more reliable brace for CBFs in seismic regions. Yet there has been limited research investigating the cyclic axial response of these members. A research study was undertaken to investigate the response of ASTM A1085/A1085M tubes using the response of ASTM A500C tubes as their reference. Forty-one brace specimens were tested under cyclic inelastic axial deformation. Comparison of the data shows that most of the ASTM A500/A500 M Grade C and ASTM A1085/1085M braces meet the respective requirements of their respective ASTM standard and that the differences between the performance of ASTM A500/A500M and ASTM A1085/1085M braces are not dramatic. In addition, the study investigated the impact of width-to-thickness ratio, global slenderness, and displacement history on the response of the braces. The data show that the current AISC 341-22 high-ductility slenderness limit for special concentrically braced frame (SCBF) braces is slightly conservative. However, the data suggest that the moderate ductility slenderness limit used for ordinary concentrically braced frame (OCBF) braces is significantly more conservative than required for consistent seismic safety. Further research is required to determine appropriate limits; this paper provides some initial recommendations based on this dataset.